El rol de la cooperación en la propensión para innovar: evidencia de la encuesta chilena de innovación
Abstract
Rev.esc.adm.neg
La innovación y la cooperación han estado estrechamente relacionadas como tópicos principales en la literatura reciente sobre management. La perspectiva de innovación abierta ha tomado en cuenta la importancia de capitalizar las ganancias de la cooperación en los esfuerzos para innovar, sin embargo, hay una falta de investigación empírica de este fenómeno para las economías emergentes.
Esta investigación tuvo por objetivo analizar el efecto de la cooperación en la propensión a innovar de las firmas, utilizando datos de la Encuesta Chilena de Innovación. Se encontró que la cooperación tiene un efecto positivo, estadísticamente significativo, en la propensión a innovar. Las implicancias del trabajo están relacionadas con la implementación de políticas, ya que según lo observado, el paradigma debiese desplazarse hacia un entorno entrelazado y estratégico de negocios, que haga más plausible la participación de las firmas en esfuerzos de redes colaborativas.
Similar Articles
-
Characterization of open innovation practices in manufacturing SMEs in Bogotá
Maria Alejandra Gómez-Cristancho, Laura Sofia Romero-Albarracin, Jose Ignacio Palacios-Osma
-
Factors Affecting Business Innovation: Empirical Evidence from Mexico
Humberto Lozano Vargas, Eddy Johanna Fajardo Ortiz, Héctor Romero
-
Determining factors in innovation processes- a quick look at the Latinamerican current situation
María Eugenia Morales, Carolina Ortíz Riaga, Mayra Alejandra Arias Cante
-
Management of the entry barriers of the Spanish company in its process for the implementation of emerging markets- The Chinese, the Brazilian and the Mexican cases
Carlos Poza, Patricia Mateo, Gonzalo Solana
-
Exchange policy and behavior of the exchange rate in Colombia, 1970-2023
Carlos Felipe Gallardo Sánchez, Jimmy Alexander Pineda Muñoz, Wilson Javier Pineda Muñoz
-
Impact of intellectual property rights on business innovation in Colombia: evidence at firm level
Jose Wilmar Quintero-Peña, Frederick Andrés Mendoza-Lozano
-
Model for the development of innovation projects in aviation technology: case study - digital test bench for GCU troubleshooting tests
Carlos Arturo Cabrera-Arias, Fabián Steven Garay-Rairan, Diana Carolina Contreras-Gutiérrez, Oscar Edilson Gómez-Vargas
-
Impact of productivity on the introduction of innovations for manufacturing companies in Cauca, Colombia
Valentina Ruiz Ruiz, Silvia Torres Ceballos, Andrés Mauricio Gómez-Sánchez
-
Innovation intensity and competitiveness of micro and small textile handicraft exporting enterprises
Alberto Magno Cutipa-Limache, Fortunato Escobar-Mamani, Manuel Anchapuri, Darío Valreymond-Tacora
-
Drivers of the propensity to innovation and productivity in the service sectors and manufacturing industry in Colombia
Rafael García-Luna, Diego Andrés Cardoso-López
Authors
References
Barona-Zuluaga, B., Rivera-Godoy, J. A., Aguilera-Cifuentes, C. I., & Garizado-Román, P. A. (2015). Funding for innovation in Colombia. Entramado, 11(1), 80-93. Becker, W., & Dietz, J. (2004). R&D cooperation and innovation activities of firms—evidence for the German manufacturing industry. Research Policy, 33(2), 209-223.
Bossink, B. A. (2002). The development of co-innovation strategies: stages and interaction patterns in interfirm innovation. R&D Management, 32(4), 311-320.
Chesbrough, H. (2003). The logic of open innovation: managing intellectual property. California Management Review, 45(3), 33-58.
Costa, P. R. D., Silveira Porto, G., Galina, R., Vasconcelos, S., Roberto Piscopo, M., & Maccari, E. A. (2017). Global Organization of Innovation and Cooperability in Brazilian Multinationals. Journal of technology management & innovation, 12(1), 13-25.
DeCanio, S. J., Dibble, C., & Amir-Atefi, K. (2000). The importance of organizational structure for the adoption of innovations. Management Science, 46(10), 1285-1299.
Edwards-Schachter, M., Castro-Martínez, E., & Fernández-de-Lucio, I. (2011). International co-operation between firms on innovation and R&D: empirical evidence from Argentina and Spain. Journal of technology management & innovation, 6(3), 126-147.
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109-123.
Freeman, C. (2002). Continental, national and sub-national innovation systems—complementarity and economic growth. Research Policy, 31(2), 191-211.
Fritsch, M., & Franke, G. (2004). Innovation, regional knowledge spillovers and R&D cooperation. Research Policy, 33(2), 245-255.
Galindo, M. Á., & Méndez, M. T. (2014). Entrepreneurship, economic growth, and innovation: Are feedback effects at work?. Journal of Business Research, 67(5), 825-829.
Guan, J., & Yam, R. C. (2015). Effects of government financial incentives on firms’ innovation performance in China: Evidences from Beijing in the 1990s. Research Policy, 44(1), 273-282.
INE. (2015). Metodología efectiva IV Encuesta de Innovación. Retrieved from Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas: http://www.economia.gob.cl/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Metodolog%C3%ADa-9na-Encuesta-Innovaci%C3%B3n.pdf
Lee, S. M., Olson, D. L., & Trimi, S. (2012). Co-innovation: convergenomics, collaboration, and co-creation for organizational values. Management Decision, 50(5), 817-831.
Miotti, L., & Sachwald, F. (2003). Co-operative R&D: why and with whom. Research Policy, 32(8), 1481-1499.
Nelson, R. R. (Ed.). (1993). National innovation systems: a comparative analysis. Oxford University Press on Demand.
OECD, Eurostat. (2005) Oslo Manual. Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data.
Perkmann, M., & Walsh, K. (2007). University-industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(4), 259-280.
Plehn-Dujowich, J. M. (2009). Firm size and types of innovation. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 18(3), 205-223.
Powell, W., Grodal, S., Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D., & Nelson, R. (2006). Oxford Handbook of innovation.
Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative science quarterly, 116-145.
Romero, D., & Molina, A. (2011). Collaborative networked organisations and customer communities: value co-creation and co-innovation in the networking era. Production Planning & Control, 22(5-6), 447-472.
Rothaermel, F. T., & Hess, A. M. (2007). Building dynamic capabilities: Innovation driven by individual-, firm-, and network-level effects. Organization Science, 18(6), 898-921.
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic management journal, 18(7), 509-533.
Temel, S., Mention, A. L., & Torkkeli, M. (2013). The impact of cooperation on firms’ innovation propensity in emerging economies. Journal of technology management & innovation, 8(1), 54-64.
Tether, B. S. (2002). Who co-operates for innovation, and why: an empirical analysis. Research Policy, 31(6), 947-967.
Tether, B. S., & Tajar, A. (2008). The organisational-cooperation mode of innovation and its prominence amongst European service firms. Research Policy, 37(4), 720-739.
Train, K. E. (2009). Discrete choice methods with simulation. Cambridge university press.
Verspagen, B. (2005). Innovation and economic growth. In The Oxford handbook of innovation.
Zhong, J., & Nieminen, M. (2015). Resource-based co-innovation through platform ecosystem: experiences of mobile payment innovation in China. Journal of Strategy and Management, 8(3), 283-298.